And Jesus says to His church:
"Do not judge so that you may not be judged. For with the judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure that you measure with, you too will be measured. So why do you see the speck in your brother's eye when you do not observe the plank of wood in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother: 'come, let me take that speck out of your eye' when behold - the plank of wood in your eye! Hypocrite! First take out the plank of wood from your own eye and then, seeing clearly, take out the speck from your brother's eye."
There are two positions I have come across in my studies which I find absolutely untenable; specifically as they relate to Jesus' teachings here and on the Sermon on the Mount as a whole. Disagree if you'd like, but they are as follows:
If God has made Jesus Christ Lord and Judge over all humanity, then I am free to be judged and not the judge. If the church is supposed to be the community of those called out as witnesses to the reality of Christ's Lordship - His position as God's chosen Judge; then is not the church supposed to be the incarnate form of Jesus' teaching here?
There are two positions I have come across in my studies which I find absolutely untenable; specifically as they relate to Jesus' teachings here and on the Sermon on the Mount as a whole. Disagree if you'd like, but they are as follows:
I
That the teaching of the Sermon on the Mount - and therefore Jesus' teaching here on judgment - is forward pointing. That is, it is simply an ideal for a purely future, coming Kingdom of God. It is not to be lived out in the here and now but can only take place in the Kingdom of God that is to come.
That the Kingdom is not fully established and that therefore some of these teachings will be shadows of what is to come or at least somewhat tarnished by human sin - I have no disagreement. But God forbid we refuse to live the ethic of Jesus' Kingdom here and now. When He says "Do not Judge" he means it for the church - the church that was, and is and is to come - for that is the time frame in which He exercises His Lordship and Divine appointment as the Judge.
II
That the teaching of the Sermon on the Mount - and therefore Jesus' teaching here on judgment - is simply for the individual. That it is not a matter of the church, or the Christian community as a whole to take to heart - but that it applies only to individuals and their individual respective relationships.
OK.
So, where did this come from?! How is it even possible to make such a distinction? Is not the Christian 'individual' an 'individual' in community? Is not the church a make up of many different individuals relating to each other in Christlikeness? If so, what difference is it? How can we say: "the individual should not judge" but "the church can and does have the right to judge?!" Is not the one simply a part of the whole? In my opinion to distinguish between the individual application of this passage and the corporate, community-wide application of this passage is a plain and simple cope out. It borders on disobedience to the Living and Active Word of our Lord Jesus Christ.
-----------------------------------------
That the Kingdom is not fully established and that therefore some of these teachings will be shadows of what is to come or at least somewhat tarnished by human sin - I have no disagreement. But God forbid we refuse to live the ethic of Jesus' Kingdom here and now. When He says "Do not Judge" he means it for the church - the church that was, and is and is to come - for that is the time frame in which He exercises His Lordship and Divine appointment as the Judge.
II
That the teaching of the Sermon on the Mount - and therefore Jesus' teaching here on judgment - is simply for the individual. That it is not a matter of the church, or the Christian community as a whole to take to heart - but that it applies only to individuals and their individual respective relationships.
OK.
So, where did this come from?! How is it even possible to make such a distinction? Is not the Christian 'individual' an 'individual' in community? Is not the church a make up of many different individuals relating to each other in Christlikeness? If so, what difference is it? How can we say: "the individual should not judge" but "the church can and does have the right to judge?!" Is not the one simply a part of the whole? In my opinion to distinguish between the individual application of this passage and the corporate, community-wide application of this passage is a plain and simple cope out. It borders on disobedience to the Living and Active Word of our Lord Jesus Christ.
-----------------------------------------
But then again ... who am I to judge?
//Ex Profundis//